Sunday 8 February 2009

Midfield muddle epitomises Molineux malaise



I'm not sure which sounds worse: two wins in nine games, or 10 points out of a possible 27?

And although we're still four points clear at the top of the table, I'm getting worried.

Standing within the massed ranks of yet another superb away following at the Ricoh on Saturday, I expected more. Much more.

Wolves are struggling, and it's not just because we're shipping soft goals. Pretty much everywhere I looked on Saturday were issues and problems.

Now Mick McCarthy points to a better second half showing, and reckons we were worth a point had Sylvan not missed his penalty, but Wolves need to be playing better than this.

Fortunately Reading and Birmingham are giving us a helping hand right now, but if Cardiff win their three games in hand, the pressure will be on.

So to the issues and problems.

How did Wayne Hennessey let such a soft shot slip under his body in the build-up to Coventry's first? I thought that was pretty feeble goalkeeping when bravery was called for - and he was also complicit in Norwich's third on Tuesday night.

Why did Matt Jarvis waste countless opportunities to deliver effective crosses? I lost count of the times he skipped down the left, but practically every centre was either too low or mis-directed.

Why was Michael Kightly playing inside-right instead of outside-right? Still our best creative option, but clearly not playing with pace or confidence. A rampant Kightly creates a rampant Wolves - and neither has been seen for weeks. And why doesn't he hug the touchline anymore?

Why isn't Sam Vokes getting a chance when Chris Iwelumo's form has completely deserted him? Big Chris has 15 goals, but hasn't scored since November 25. Increasingly, he's finding it easier to upset referees than find the net - and surely Vokes, with two goals in three substitute appearances, is worth a run now.

And why did Wolves line-up with Karl Henry and Nigel Quashie at the heart of midfield?

Quashie gives it his best, but what message is being sent by deploying two similar players in midfield? David Jones is a better passer than either, and David Edwards is more athletic.

And there is no disguising the fact that Quashie was deemed surplus to requirements by a manager struggling to properly kick-start Birmingham's promotion push.

Wolves burst to the top of the league in the closing months of 2008 with some delightful attacking play that dazzled the fans, and left opposition defences in large amounts of disarray.

Most of those players were on show at Coventry yesterday, but it all felt a bit one-paced. Maybe even lethargic - and muddled in midfield.

I vote a rapid return for Jones in midfield alongside Quashie or Henry, Vokes alongside Sylvan - and Kightly and Jarvis to start delivering and living up to their star billing.

And despite the goals conceded column, I still can't a better back four than Kevin Foley, Richard Stearman, Christophe Berra, and Stephen Ward.

This isn't a crisis, but it's not very clever.

No comments: